Search PG Economics

Use the search below to search our website, if you can't find what you're looking for then contact us and we will do our best to help you.

 

 

Mandatory labelling of crop biotechnology-derived foods: the evidence shows this is a failed regulatory policy

Published on: 20th September 2022
Published By Graham Brookes



20 September 2022

Agricultural economist Graham Brookes warns that the practical experience of mandatory labelling of genetically modified (GM) food products on both sides of the Atlantic has resulted in reduced choice, increased food industry costs and higher prices for consumers.   

Proponents of mandatory labelling of foods containing or derived from genetically modified (GM) crops have long claimed that their primary objective is to facilitate informed consumer choice.  Based on a review of more than 20 years of evidence in countries or regions where mandatory GM labelling has been implemented, that policy has failed.  The main outcomes have been increased food industry costs across the supply chain, higher prices and reduced choice for consumers.  In contrast, in cases where labelling is voluntary, consumers and taxpayers have had more food choices with lower costs.

To the majority of consumers, labelling GM ingredients has been a ‘non issue’ for which they are incurring additional costs. The primary beneficiaries are the minority of consumers who wish to avoid products derived from GM technology as well as businesses in the production and supply chain of non-GM products who benefit from the price premiums and ancillary services like GM trace testing. 

The evidence is clear: compulsory GM product labelling is a case of ‘inconsistent and poor regulation leading to a poor outcome’.  Voluntary labelling initiatives are better able to deliver more informed consumer choice at a lower net cost to society.  Policymakers around the world should not repeat these mistakes when considering the issue of labelling for gene edited foods.  

 

 

Graham Brookes: 20th Sep 2022 11:33:00

Download PDF Version | Download Full Report
 

Feeding The Uk Sustainably: Time For Policy Inaction To End

As Ministers prepare to unveil a new land use framework for England this autumn, the scientific evidence behind land sparing as the most effective farm policy for delivering food production, climate and biodiversity goals is compelling. Why then does the UK government continue to favour a land sharing approach through its environmental land management schemes? The recent ‘re-interpretation’ of an expert land use report for the large, land-owning NGOs who commissioned it may provide some clues, writes agricultural economist Graham Brookes.

European Court Ruling On Neonicotinoids Further Highlights Muddle Created By Ongoing Eu Regulatory Inconsistency And Dysfunction

The recent Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling that EU Member States can no longer grant derogations (exemptions) for the use of neonicotinoid seed treatments to control pests in arable crops like sugar beet and oilseed rape raises a number of important questions and highlights the regulatory inconsistency and muddle that the European Union (EU) has created for itself

Feeding The World Sustainably: Crop Biotechnology Continues To Make A Significant Contribution, Concludes New Research

GM crop technology continues to make an important contribution to reducing the environmental footprint of agriculture and securing global food supplies in a sustainable way. It has reduced pressure to bring new land into agriculture, which is vital if the world is to maintain and restore the natural habitats and vegetation that are best for many species of plants and animal life and for storing carbon” said Graham Brookes, director of PG Economics, author of the research.

Mandatory Labelling Of Crop Biotechnology-derived Foods: The Evidence Shows This Is A Failed Regulatory Policy

Proponents of mandatory labelling of foods containing or derived from genetically modified (GM) crops have long claimed that their primary objective is to facilitate informed consumer choice. Based on a review of more than 20 years of evidence in countries or regions where mandatory GM labelling has been implemented, that policy has failed. The main outcomes have been higher prices and reduced choice for consumers.