PG Economics
Search PG Economics

Search PG Economics

Use the search below to search our website, if you can't find what you're looking for then contact us and we will do our best to help you.

 

 

Crop biotechnology offers significant economic and environmental gains to Ukraine's agriculture

Published on: 14th June 2012
Published By PG Economics

Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on Google +
Share on LinkedIn

14th June 2012: A new assessment of the potential impacts of using existing commercialised crop biotechnology in Ukraine shows that considerable economic and environmental benefits would occur if farmers were allowed access to the technology. 

‘Crop biotechnology would provide important economic and production gains, improved incomes and reduced risk for farmers in Ukraine if they were allowed to use the technology” said Graham Brookes, director of PG Economics, co-author of the report. “The environment would also improve from farmers using more benign herbicides or replacing insecticide use with insect resistant maize”

Previewing the study, the key findings are:

  • The total annual potential farm level benefit to Ukraine from using relevant, current GM technology is up to $525 million;
  • Yield gains are likely to arise with the adoption of GM technology, resulting in higher production levels of each crop. This is potentially in the range of a +0.9 million tonnes to +3.2 million tonnes increase in production, equal to +1.5% to +9.5% of the total annual production of the four crops;
  • More intensive producers are likely to gain mainly from reduced costs of production, although yield improvements are also likely to occur. For the majority, more extensive producers, the main benefit from using GM technology is likely to be higher yields;
  • Total herbicide use across the four crops would probably fall by between 4.4% and 7.8% (about 0.24 million to 0.42 million kg). As a result, this will decrease the environmental impact associated with herbicide use on the area planted to GM herbicide tolerant crops by between 15% and 24% ;
  • Insecticides currently annually used on about 100,000 ha of maize, would no longer be needed, contributing a further reduction in pesticide applications of about 23,000 kg of active ingredient;
  • The reduction in herbicide and insecticide use would annually yield fuel savings of between 0.78 million litres and 1.56 million litres. This would result in lower levels of carbon dioxide emissions of between 2.73 million kg and 5.35 million kg.

Download full report in English - PDF 0.6 Kb

Download full report in Ukraine - PDF 1.3 Kb

For additional information, contact Graham Brookes Tel +44(0) 1531 650123. www.pgeconomics.co.uk

PG Economics: 14th Jun 2012 10:28:00

 

What Is (risk) Appropriate Regulation Of Gene Editing Technology?

Despite the much-hyped expectation that Europe was on course to follow other parts of the world in removing GMO-style regulatory requirements from gene edited (GE) crops, with EU elections looming and no agreement in sight the bloc now risks slipping back towards precautionary inertia. Summarising their recent peer-reviewed paper exploring risk-appropriate regulation for gene editing, agricultural economists Graham Brookes and Stuart Smyth warn that we must learn the lessons from past experience of divergent international regulation of agricultural innovations. The impact of over-precautionary EU regulation of gene editing will not only disadvantage European agriculture, but will also compromise global efforts to address urgent climate, biodiversity and food security challenges, they argue.

Feeding The Uk Sustainably: Time For Policy Inaction To End

As Ministers prepare to unveil a new land use framework for England this autumn, the scientific evidence behind land sparing as the most effective farm policy for delivering food production, climate and biodiversity goals is compelling. Why then does the UK government continue to favour a land sharing approach through its environmental land management schemes? The recent ‘re-interpretation’ of an expert land use report for the large, land-owning NGOs who commissioned it may provide some clues, writes agricultural economist Graham Brookes.

European Court Ruling On Neonicotinoids Further Highlights Muddle Created By Ongoing Eu Regulatory Inconsistency And Dysfunction

The recent Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling that EU Member States can no longer grant derogations (exemptions) for the use of neonicotinoid seed treatments to control pests in arable crops like sugar beet and oilseed rape raises a number of important questions and highlights the regulatory inconsistency and muddle that the European Union (EU) has created for itself

Feeding The World Sustainably: Crop Biotechnology Continues To Make A Significant Contribution, Concludes New Research

GM crop technology continues to make an important contribution to reducing the environmental footprint of agriculture and securing global food supplies in a sustainable way. It has reduced pressure to bring new land into agriculture, which is vital if the world is to maintain and restore the natural habitats and vegetation that are best for many species of plants and animal life and for storing carbon” said Graham Brookes, director of PG Economics, author of the research.