Search PG Economics

Use the search below to search our website, if you can't find what you're looking for then contact us and we will do our best to help you.



EU losing out on contributions to sustainable farming from biotech traits[1]

Published on: 8th June 2009
Published By PG Economics

June 8th 2009, Dorchester, Dorset: New study shows GM insect resistant (GM IR) maize[2] has delivered important economic and environmental benefits but only a small part of the potential benefit is currently being realised.

 “GM insect resistant maize adoption by EU farmers has contributed to reducing insecticide spraying, improved the quality of maize and significantly boosted farmers’ incomes,” said Graham Brookes, director of PG Economics, and author of the report. “The technology has made important contributions to increasing yields, reducing production risks and improving productivity.  These benefits are, however, being denied to farmers and citizens alike in several maize-growing EU Member States, with the biggest losers being the very countries which have effectively banned the use of the technology; Italy, France, Germany and Austria”

 Previewing the findings of the comprehensive study, the key findings are:     

  • In maize growing regions affected by corn boring pests, the main impact has been higher yields compared to conventional maize (average yield benefits of +10%);
  • In 2007, users of GM IR maize[3] earned average, additional income levels of +€186/ha (range of +€25 to +€201/ha).  Across all users of the technology, the total increase in farm income directly attributable to the technology in 2007 was +€20.6 million;
  • In certain regions, GM IR maize has delivered important improvements in grain quality from significant reductions in the levels of mycotoxins found in the grain;
  • Where maize growers have traditionally used insecticides to control corn boring pests, the switch to using GM IR technology has resulted in important reductions in insecticides use and its associated environmental impact (notably in Spain);
  • The potential EU adoption area for GM IR maize is between 2.25 million ha and 4 million ha, depending on the annual levels of pest pressure.  At these levels of adoption, the annual direct farm income benefit potential is €160 million and €247 million.  Across the EU only between 8% and 12% of this total potential benefit is being realised;
  • The countries currently foregoing the largest economic gains from GM IR maize technology are Italy, France and Germany, followed by Austria and Romania;
  • Annual savings of between 0.41 million kg and 0.7 million kg of insecticide active ingredient could be realised if GM IR maize technology was used on its full potential area.  At present, only between 14% and 25% of the total potential environmental benefit from reduced insecticide use is being realised;
  • Spain is the only EU member state where GM IR maize adoption levels are currently delivering farm income and environmental gains at or near full potential levels;
  • The countries currently foregoing the largest environmental benefits that might reasonably be realised from the use of GM IR maize are Italy, France and Germany[4].

For additional information, contact Graham Brookes.  Tel 00 44 (0) 1531 650123

[1] Download Full report .  This report also updates a previous study (using the same methodology), available on the same website and in the peer review scientific journal, International Journal of Biotechnology (2008, vol 10, 2/3).

[2] The only GM trait currently permitted for commercial farming use in the EU

[3] On about 110,000 hectares across the EU

[4] Austria and Romania lose out significantly in economic terms but less so environmentally, because use of insecticides for corn borer control in conventional maize production is a much less practiced corn borer control measure in these countries compared to Italy, France, and Germany

PG Economics: 8th Jun 2009 10:36:00


Asian Farmers Would See Annual Weed Control Costs Increase By $1.4 To $1.9 Billion Due To Potential Restrictions On Glyphosate Use, New Study Reports

A new paper published in the journal Agbioforum (1) points to higher weed control costs, less effective weed control, more difficult access to fields and lower yields, if farmers in seven Asian countries could no longer use glyphosate. The peer reviewed paper written by Graham Brookes of PG Economics Ltd examined the current use of glyphosate, the reasons for its use and what changes farmers would make to their weed control programs if glyphosate was no longer available for use. Seven countries were included in the study – Australia, China, India, Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam and Thailand – as these were representative of countries where glyphosate use in agriculture is significant, countries that may be considering use restrictions for glyphosate and countries were farmers are planting glyphosate tolerant crops.

Uk Urged To ‘bring Back’ Sound Science As The Basis For Regulating Crop Genetic Innovations Post-brexit

‘UK plant genetics: a regulatory environment to maximise advantage to the UK economy post Brexit’ considers three future scenarios for the regulation of gene edited crops and genetically modified organisms (GMOs), ranging from maintaining current alignment with the EU through improved implementation of EU rules, to the UK setting its own regulatory path on both GMOs and NBTs.

New Published Research Paper - Environmental Impacts Of Genetically Modified (gm) Crop Use 1996–2016: Impacts On Pesticide Use And Carbon Emissions

New published research paper - Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) Crop use 1996–2016: Impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions - GMO, active ingredient, biotech crops, carbon sequestration, environmental impact quotient, no tillage, pesticide

Biotech Crop Adoption Leads To Greater Sustainability And Socioeconomic Opportunities For Global Farmers And Citizens

The complementary studies – PG Economics’ “GM Crops: Global Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts 1996-2016” and ISAAA’s “Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2017” – examine the continued widespread adoption of global crop biotechnology, and the significant positive socio-economic and environmental impacts of this adoption by farmers and communities around the globe.