Search PG Economics

Use the search below to search our website, if you can't find what you're looking for then contact us and we will do our best to help you.

 

 

Turkey’s biosafety law causing significant economic harm to agri-food chain

Published on: 2nd May 2012
Published By PG Economics



May 2nd 2012: A new Economic Impact Assessment of Turkey’s Biosafety Law finds that the way in which this Law is being implemented has resulted in substantial negative economic impacts for the important Turkish importing, feed and food manufacturing and livestock production sectors.

“There is clear evidence of major economic damage and market disruption having been caused by the way in which Turkey’s Biosafety Law is being implemented” said Graham Brookes, lead author of the report. “This situation can be expected to get progressively worse, threatening the viability of many Turkish businesses (notably small-and medium-sized enterprises) and risking the export of jobs and investment from the country, unless a timely and science-based Turkish GMO approval system is operated”

Previewing the study, the key findings are:

  • The implementation of the Law has caused considerable trade and market disruption, which to date amounts to over $0.8 billion. This is roughly equal to between 33% and 50% of the total annual net profitability of the Turkish food and drink sector;
  • The on-going annual cost (assuming no change to current policy) can reasonably be expected to be between $0.7 billion and $1 billion (and could be higher);
  • With an expected widening discrepancy between the timing and nature of new GM event approvals in Turkey compared to major cereal and oilseed raw material supplying countries, and the rapidly-increasing ‘pipeline’ of new traits and combinations of existing/new ‘stacked’ traits being approved for use in global agriculture, the negative impact is likely to get progressively worse;
  • The implementation of the Law has significantly increased legal and business uncertainty, reducing business confidence and adding further to negative economic impact and outlook;
  • The reduced levels of profitability, increased uncertainty and market disruption may result in re-location of processing facilities outside Turkey, leading to lower levels of income and employment generation, as Turkish jobs and investment are exported;
  • Those at greatest risk are small and medium-sized businesses that dominate the Turkish food sector;
  • There has been trade diversion away from traditional raw material suppliers (GMO producing countries). This raises the potential of a World Trade Organisation (WTO) complaint/challenge being launched against Turkey that could currently be worth over $1.1 billion.

If these significant negative economic impacts are to be avoided, the Turkish GMO regulations need to be implemented through timely application of a science-based approval system.

For additional information, contact Graham Brookes Tel +44(0) 1531 650123. www.pgeconomics.co.uk

PG Economics: 2nd May 2012 10:30:00

| Download Full Report
 

Uk Urged To ‘bring Back’ Sound Science As The Basis For Regulating Crop Genetic Innovations Post-brexit

‘UK plant genetics: a regulatory environment to maximise advantage to the UK economy post Brexit’ considers three future scenarios for the regulation of gene edited crops and genetically modified organisms (GMOs), ranging from maintaining current alignment with the EU through improved implementation of EU rules, to the UK setting its own regulatory path on both GMOs and NBTs.

New Published Research Paper - Environmental Impacts Of Genetically Modified (gm) Crop Use 1996–2016: Impacts On Pesticide Use And Carbon Emissions

New published research paper - Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) Crop use 1996–2016: Impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions - GMO, active ingredient, biotech crops, carbon sequestration, environmental impact quotient, no tillage, pesticide

Biotech Crop Adoption Leads To Greater Sustainability And Socioeconomic Opportunities For Global Farmers And Citizens

The complementary studies – PG Economics’ “GM Crops: Global Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts 1996-2016” and ISAAA’s “Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2017” – examine the continued widespread adoption of global crop biotechnology, and the significant positive socio-economic and environmental impacts of this adoption by farmers and communities around the globe.

New Published Research Paper - Farm Income And Production Impacts Of Using Gm Crop Technology 1996–2016

Farm income and production impacts of using GM crop technology 1996–2016